I’ve been reading through Daniel Velleman and Stan Wagon’s puzzle book *Bicycle or Unicycle?* and generally enjoying it – the puzzles include simple variations on classics, clever things I haven’t seen before, and some nontrivial uses of real mathematical thinking (as in the title puzzle, which asks whether it is possible for a bicycle to move in such a way that its rear wheel follows exactly along the path of its front wheel). Of course, Tanya’s blog appears several times. The solutions often go beyond the puzzle posed. As is to be expected, they have some coin-weighing puzzles. Here is a generalization of one of them:

You are presented with a set of coins, among which are special. You cannot tell which ones are special and which ones are not. Your goal is to choose a subset of coins that contains exactly special coins. After each choice, an oracle tells you whether or not you have succeeded. What is the value of the smallest number of guesses you need to make to succeed?

Velleman–Wagon ask for the value of *f*(8, 4, 2); their source for the problem is the puzzle column from the MSRI newsletter, which asks to show that *f*(100, 50, 25) ≤ 50. Here are some some additional facts one might like to show (assuming, as is natural, that 0 ≤ *k* ≤ *S* ≤ *N*):

- for all choices of
*N*, *S*, *k*

Can one say anything interesting in general? For example, what is the asymptotic growth of for fixed *k*?

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

Or for constants 0 <

β<α< 1? (For this version, I think that I can prove that you need at least guesses, for a constantcthat depends onαandβ, by considering how manyS-subsets intersect a givenm-set in exactlykelements; the bestmis about , and then you do a union bound.)